Artificial Intelligence

Law CEO ran partner reviews on AI for $62

Gilbert + Tobin runs legal workflows on ChatGPT Work and Codex, with a 120-partner review done for about $62.

StartupHub.ai Staff

By StartupHub.ai Staff, reviewed by Daniel Singer, Editor

2 min read

Gilbert + Tobin CEO Sam Nickless on AI legal workflows
Credit: OpenAI News

Gilbert + Tobin has moved from open experimentation to defined, multistep agentic workflows built on ChatGPT Enterprise, ChatGPT Work and Codex, OpenAI says in a Q&A with Partner and Chief Executive Officer Sam Nickless. People still define the task, check the output and take responsibility for the final work. The stated aim is better service and a better workplace, not fewer lawyers.

The number that sticks is about $62.

Nickless said he used ChatGPT Work for a confidential annual review covering 120 partners. The system updated files from a spreadsheet, created PDFs and bundled the finished material in minutes, he said. The usage dashboard later showed a cost of about $62 for that run, work he said would otherwise have taken several people multiple days. It is a concrete step removed from the CEO workflow, not a pilot slide.

Adoption is unusually high, with 87% active usage among enabled ChatGPT users, according to the firm. That is more than twice the rate Gilbert + Tobin typically sees for other tools, the firm said. There were no usage mandates.

What replaced the mandate was visible use. Nickless built a custom GPT as a digital twin from his writing, feedback and working style, then shared it so direct reports could test thinking before meeting him. The business transformation team showed role-specific workflows, while showcases, challenges and an early AI bounty surfaced ideas beyond the technology team. Nickless said, "Getting started yourself...sets the tone and encourages others."

The limit is governance, and the firm names it. Early work barred client data, then scale came with Australian data residency, contractual protections, role-based access and admin controls, OpenAI says. Inside AI framed the same rollout around cost savings and efficiency gains, while Nickless told OpenAI the value so far "hasn’t been about reducing cost or needing fewer people, but freeing our people to focus on the more human side of their work." The test for peers is whether partners will do real client work in the tool and still own the check.

Sources

Get the free daily brief every morning

Every morning the day's AI news, new AI startups and new funding rounds. Free and takes a few minutes to read, unsubscribe at any time.

Join 64,000 other subscribers.

TopicsGilbert + TobinSam NicklessOpenAIChatGPTChatGPT WorkChatGPT EnterpriseCodex

StartupHub.ai Staff

Written by

StartupHub.ai StaffEditorial team

The staff writers of StartupHub.ai, ranging from investment analysts to avid AI tool users, early adopters and critical enthusiasts. Backgrounds span engineering, business and the arts. We hold every piece to rigorous standards of research and review.

Daniel Singer

Reviewed by

Daniel Singer is an AI expert who has been writing about, covering and building AI technology since 2018.

Test your Agent Readiness now

Paste your website. How well ChatGPT, Claude and the other agents can read and use a site, in about a minute.

Watch

The videos behind the news, one flip at a time

The feed mixes the videos from our articles with startup demos and you flip through them like TV channels for free with no signup.