Triple Whale vs Varos
Triple Whale vs Varos, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Triple Whale is on 63/100 and Varos on 56/100.
Where each one leads
Triple Whale
- our overall score: 63/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 77/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 281 against 13
- funding raised: $51.7M against $4.0M
- LinkedIn following: 46,264 against 1,181
Varos
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Triple Whale | Varos |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | All your e-commerce data in one easy-to-use dashboard, building the operating system for eCom. | Data sharing platform enabling e-commerce businesses to benchmark KPIs against peers. |
| Category | E-commerce, Data, Data Analytics, Analytics Platform | E-commerce, Analytics, Data, Marketing |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Triple Whale | Varos |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 281 | 13 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +37.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $51.7M | $4.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 46,264 | 1,181 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Triple Whale | Varos |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 56/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 44/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 77/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Triple Whale | Varos |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Render |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Base44 |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Support stack | Intercom, HubSpot | Not detected |
Triple Whale vs Varos: common questions
Which is better, Triple Whale or Varos?
On our 0-100 score Triple Whale rates higher (63/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Triple Whale and Varos compare on the numbers?
Triple Whale leads on our overall score (63/100 against 56/100), domain rating (77/100 against 58/100), headcount (281 against 13), funding raised ($51.7M against $4.0M), LinkedIn following (46,264 against 1,181).
Read the full Triple Whale review and pricing or the Varos review and pricing. You can also browse other Triple Whale alternatives we track.