Tabnine vs Sourcegraph (Cody)
Tabnine vs Sourcegraph (Cody), compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Tabnine is on 64/100 and Sourcegraph (Cody) on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Tabnine
- our overall score: 64/100 against 60/100
Sourcegraph (Cody)
- funding raised: $301M against $55.1M
At a glance
| Measure | Tabnine | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Tabnine is a secure generative AI code assistant that enhances developer efficiency with dependable code completion. | AI coding assistant that understands, writes, and fixes code faster using LLMs and code context. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, Coding, Generative AI | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2013 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Tabnine | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 68 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $55.1M | $301M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.6B |
| LinkedIn followers | 23,617 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Tabnine | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 58/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Tabnine | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Svelte |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Tabnine | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 4 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“One competitor off my list - tabnine. While I waited for my usage limit to reset, I tried tabnine giving it one simple task: "Refactor my homepage for clean code". It failed miserably.”r/ClaudeAI
Tabnine vs Sourcegraph (Cody): common questions
Which is better, Tabnine or Sourcegraph (Cody)?
On our 0-100 score Tabnine rates higher (64/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Tabnine and Sourcegraph (Cody) compare on the numbers?
Tabnine leads on our overall score (64/100 against 60/100). Sourcegraph (Cody) leads on funding raised ($301M against $55.1M).
What do real users say about Tabnine and Sourcegraph (Cody)?
Tabnine: 0 positive and 4 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/ClaudeAI.
Read the full Tabnine review and pricing or the Sourcegraph (Cody) review and pricing. You can also browse other Tabnine alternatives we track.