CATO Networks vs Check Point Software
CATO Networks vs Check Point Software, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: CATO Networks is on 74/100 and Check Point Software on 72/100.
Where each one leads
CATO Networks
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Check Point Software
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 90/100 against 76/100
- headcount: 8,461 against 1,692
- funding raised: $1.5B against $951M
- LinkedIn following: 434,966 against 191,952
At a glance
| Measure | CATO Networks | Check Point Software |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The world's first SASE platform, converging SD-WAN, network security, and a global private backbone. | Global cybersecurity leader providing AI-powered solutions for enterprises and governments. |
| Category | SASE, SD-WAN, Network Security, Cloud Security | Cybersecurity, Enterprise, Network Security, Endpoint Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 1993 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | CATO Networks | Check Point Software |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,692 | 8,461 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +36.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $951M | $1.5B |
| Latest round | Series H | Post IPO Debt Funding |
| Valuation | $3.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 191,952 | 434,966 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Check Point Software |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 74/100 | 72/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 80/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 47/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 85/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 90/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | CATO Networks | Check Point Software |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | Drift |
CATO Networks vs Check Point Software: common questions
Which is better, CATO Networks or Check Point Software?
On our 0-100 score CATO Networks rates higher (74/100 against 72/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do CATO Networks and Check Point Software compare on the numbers?
Check Point Software leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 50/100), domain rating (90/100 against 76/100), headcount (8,461 against 1,692), funding raised ($1.5B against $951M), LinkedIn following (434,966 against 191,952).
Read the full CATO Networks review and pricing or the Check Point Software review and pricing. You can also browse other CATO Networks alternatives we track.