Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies) vs Impossible Foods
Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies) vs Impossible Foods, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies) is on 53/100 and Impossible Foods on 68/100.
Where each one leads
Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies)
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Impossible Foods
- our overall score: 68/100 against 53/100
- domain rating: 75/100 against 29/100
- funding raised: $1.3B against $60.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies) | Impossible Foods |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cultivated meat company producing meat directly from animal cells without slaughter. | Develops plant-based meat alternatives that mimic the taste, texture, and aroma of conventional meat. |
| Category | FoodTech, Cellular Agriculture, Lab-Grown Meat, Biotech | FoodTech, Cellular Agriculture, Plant-Based Meat, Sustainable Food |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Hardware | services | Food product |
| Founded | 2018 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Raleigh, United States | Redwood City, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies) | Impossible Foods |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 125 | Not published |
| Total funding | $60.0M | $1.3B |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 28,402 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies) | Impossible Foods |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 68/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 75/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies) | Impossible Foods |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies) vs Impossible Foods: common questions
Which is better, Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies) or Impossible Foods?
On our 0-100 score Impossible Foods rates higher (68/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies) and Impossible Foods compare on the numbers?
Impossible Foods leads on our overall score (68/100 against 53/100), domain rating (75/100 against 29/100), funding raised ($1.3B against $60.0M).
Read the full Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies) review and pricing or the Impossible Foods review and pricing. You can also browse other Believer Meats (formerly Future Meat Technologies) alternatives we track.