Aqua Security vs Zafran Security
Aqua Security vs Zafran Security, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Aqua Security is on 69/100 and Zafran Security on 64/100.
Where each one leads
Aqua Security
- our overall score: 69/100 against 64/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 466 against 192
- funding raised: $401M against $130M
- LinkedIn following: 66,597 against 14,087
Zafran Security
- headcount growth: +87.0% against -0.5%
At a glance
| Measure | Aqua Security | Zafran Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud native security platform for prevention, detection, and response across the application lifecycle. | Mobilizes existing security controls to protect organizations during critical exploitation windows with an AI-native Threat Exposure Management platform. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Native, Container | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2015 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Aqua Security | Zafran Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 466 | 192 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -0.5% | +87.0% |
| Total funding | $401M | $130M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series A |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,597 | 14,087 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Zafran Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 64/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 80/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 48/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Aqua Security | Zafran Security |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Linkedin Insight, Reddit Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot, Zendesk |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Aqua Security | Zafran Security |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 4 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads |
“Zafran Security Secures $60 Million in Series C Funding to Enhance Cyber Defense. Zafran Security, a New York-based cybersecurity startup, has raised $60 million in a Series C funding round to boost product development and global reach.”r/pwnhub
Aqua Security vs Zafran Security: common questions
Which is better, Aqua Security or Zafran Security?
On our 0-100 score Aqua Security rates higher (69/100 against 64/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Aqua Security and Zafran Security compare on the numbers?
Aqua Security leads on our overall score (69/100 against 64/100), domain rating (78/100 against 48/100), headcount (466 against 192), funding raised ($401M against $130M), LinkedIn following (66,597 against 14,087). Zafran Security leads on headcount growth (+87.0% against -0.5%).
What do real users say about Aqua Security and Zafran Security?
Zafran Security: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/pwnhub.
Read the full Aqua Security review and pricing or the Zafran Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Aqua Security alternatives we track.