Wiliot vs ZeroRISC
Wiliot vs ZeroRISC, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Wiliot is on 69/100 and ZeroRISC on 41/100.
Where each one leads
Wiliot
- our overall score: 69/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 35/100
- funding raised: $344M against $10.0M
- LinkedIn following: 16,525 against 3,183
ZeroRISC
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Wiliot | ZeroRISC |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Wiliot provides self-powered IoT Pixels that bring connectivity and intelligence to everyday products. | ZeroRISC is a cybersecurity company focused on providing hardware-based security solutions for RISC-V architectures. |
| Category | IoT, Energy, Radio Frequency, Semiconductor | Cybersecurity, Hardware, RISC-V, Embedded Systems |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | Not published |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Jose, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Wiliot | ZeroRISC |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 265 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +15.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $344M | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Strategic Investment | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 16,525 | 3,183 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Wiliot | ZeroRISC |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 41/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 35/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 40/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Wiliot | ZeroRISC |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Wiliot vs ZeroRISC: common questions
Which is better, Wiliot or ZeroRISC?
On our 0-100 score Wiliot rates higher (69/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Wiliot and ZeroRISC compare on the numbers?
Wiliot leads on our overall score (69/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 38/100), domain rating (58/100 against 35/100), funding raised ($344M against $10.0M), LinkedIn following (16,525 against 3,183).
Read the full Wiliot review and pricing or the ZeroRISC review and pricing. You can also browse other Wiliot alternatives we track.