Sweet Security vs Upwind Security
Sweet Security vs Upwind Security, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Sweet Security is on 63/100 and Upwind Security on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Sweet Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Upwind Security
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 456 against 119
- headcount growth: +304.1% against +126.9%
- funding raised: $178M against $128M
- LinkedIn following: 27,600 against 8,963
At a glance
| Measure | Sweet Security | Upwind Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Cloud runtime security suite defending cloud workloads with offensive and defensive expertise. | Runtime-powered CNAPP that secures cloud infrastructure with runtime insights. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, DevSecOps, AppSec | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Cloud Security, Threat Detection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Sweet Security | Upwind Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 119 | 456 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +126.9% | +304.1% |
| Total funding | $128M | $178M |
| Latest round | Seed | Extension |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.6B |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,963 | 27,600 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Sweet Security | Upwind Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 37/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 47/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Sweet Security | Upwind Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Sweet Security | Upwind Security |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 2 threads |
“Upwind Secures $250M in Series B Funding at a $1.5B Valuation to Advance Cloud Security Platform. Upwind raised $250 million in Series B funding led by Bessemer Venture Partners, with Salesforce Ventures and Picture Capital also participati”r/kainjoo
Sweet Security vs Upwind Security: common questions
Which is better, Sweet Security or Upwind Security?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 22 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do Sweet Security and Upwind Security compare on the numbers?
Upwind Security leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 39/100), domain rating (67/100 against 47/100), headcount (456 against 119), headcount growth (+304.1% against +126.9%), funding raised ($178M against $128M), LinkedIn following (27,600 against 8,963).
What do real users say about Sweet Security and Upwind Security?
Upwind Security: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/kainjoo.
Read the full Sweet Security review and pricing or the Upwind Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Sweet Security alternatives we track.