Supabase vs Visual Layer
Supabase vs Visual Layer, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Supabase is on 70/100 and Visual Layer on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Supabase
- our overall score: 70/100 against 50/100
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 40/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 342 against 29
- funding raised: $933M against $7.0M
- LinkedIn following: 99,093 against 4,160
Visual Layer
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Supabase | Visual Layer |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Open source Firebase alternative with a PostgreSQL backend and real-time capabilities. | AI-powered database for visual data, enabling intelligent search and analysis of images and videos. |
| Category | Database, Backend as a Service, Developer Tools, API Platform | Database, Artificial Intelligence, Generative AI, Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Supabase | Visual Layer |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 342 | 29 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +33.8% |
| Total funding | $933M | $7.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Seed |
| Valuation | $11B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 99,093 | 4,160 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Supabase | Visual Layer |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 72/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 75/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (66/100) | D (40/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 38/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Supabase | Visual Layer |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Supabase vs Visual Layer: common questions
Which is better, Supabase or Visual Layer?
On our 0-100 score Supabase rates higher (70/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Supabase and Visual Layer compare on the numbers?
Supabase leads on our overall score (70/100 against 50/100), agent readiness (66/100 against 40/100), domain rating (91/100 against 38/100), headcount (342 against 29), funding raised ($933M against $7.0M), LinkedIn following (99,093 against 4,160).
Read the full Supabase review and pricing or the Visual Layer review and pricing. You can also browse other Supabase alternatives we track.