StereoLabs vs Uma
StereoLabs vs Uma, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: StereoLabs is on 54/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
StereoLabs
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 63/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 58 against 29
- LinkedIn following: 8,354 against 5,831
Uma
- our overall score: 58/100 against 54/100
- funding raised: $40.0M against $30.0M
At a glance
| Measure | StereoLabs | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Vision-based perception systems for robotics and industrial applications. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, Hardware, Computer Vision, Computer Vision Hardware | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2011 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | StereoLabs | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 58 | 29 |
| Total funding | $30.0M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,354 | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | StereoLabs | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (59/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 63/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | StereoLabs | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
StereoLabs vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, StereoLabs or Uma?
On our 0-100 score Uma rates higher (58/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do StereoLabs and Uma compare on the numbers?
StereoLabs leads on agent readiness (59/100 against 42/100), domain rating (63/100 against 36/100), headcount (58 against 29), LinkedIn following (8,354 against 5,831). Uma leads on our overall score (58/100 against 54/100), funding raised ($40.0M against $30.0M).
Read the full StereoLabs review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other StereoLabs alternatives we track.