ScyllaDB vs Tigris Data
ScyllaDB vs Tigris Data, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ScyllaDB is on 67/100 and Tigris Data on 55/100.
Where each one leads
ScyllaDB
- our overall score: 67/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 225 against 23
- funding raised: $101M against $53.5M
- LinkedIn following: 28,743 against 1,982
Tigris Data
- agent readiness: 67/100 against 46/100
At a glance
| Measure | ScyllaDB | Tigris Data |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | ScyllaDB is a high-performance, low-latency NoSQL database for data-intensive applications, designed to scale with modern infrastructure. | A cloud-native database for building scalable, real-time applications with a focus on developer experience. |
| Category | Database, Enterprise, NoSQL, NoSQL Database | Database, Cloud Infrastructure, Developer Tools, Data Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ScyllaDB | Tigris Data |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 225 | 23 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $101M | $53.5M |
| Latest round | Debt | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 28,743 | 1,982 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ScyllaDB | Tigris Data |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | C (67/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 66/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ScyllaDB | Tigris Data |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | ScyllaDB | Tigris Data |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“My custom RDBMS is 588,235x faster than ScyllaDB on my laptop with fsync on executing a complex HTAP query.”r/Database
ScyllaDB vs Tigris Data: common questions
Which is better, ScyllaDB or Tigris Data?
On our 0-100 score ScyllaDB rates higher (67/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ScyllaDB and Tigris Data compare on the numbers?
ScyllaDB leads on our overall score (67/100 against 55/100), headcount (225 against 23), funding raised ($101M against $53.5M), LinkedIn following (28,743 against 1,982). Tigris Data leads on agent readiness (67/100 against 46/100).
What do real users say about ScyllaDB and Tigris Data?
ScyllaDB: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Database.
Read the full ScyllaDB review and pricing or the Tigris Data review and pricing. You can also browse other ScyllaDB alternatives we track.