Ruby Receptionists vs Smith.ai
Ruby Receptionists vs Smith.ai, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ruby Receptionists is on 52/100 and Smith.ai on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Ruby Receptionists
- headcount: 672 against 325
- funding raised: $38.8M against $12.0M
Smith.ai
- our overall score: 60/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 39/100
- LinkedIn following: 23,215 against 14,304
At a glance
| Measure | Ruby Receptionists | Smith.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | 24/7 virtual receptionist and live chat services for small to medium-sized businesses. | AI-powered virtual receptionist and client engagement service for small businesses. |
| Category | Customer Support, Virtual Assistant, Call Center Services, Small Business Services | AI, Virtual Receptionist, Customer Service, Small Business |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | SaaS |
| Founded | 2003 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Portland, United States | Los Altos, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ruby Receptionists | Smith.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 672 | 325 |
| Total funding | $38.8M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Majority Equity Investment | Seed Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,304 | 23,215 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ruby Receptionists | Smith.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 70/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ruby Receptionists | Smith.ai |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Ruby Receptionists vs Smith.ai: common questions
Which is better, Ruby Receptionists or Smith.ai?
On our 0-100 score Smith.ai rates higher (60/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ruby Receptionists and Smith.ai compare on the numbers?
Ruby Receptionists leads on headcount (672 against 325), funding raised ($38.8M against $12.0M). Smith.ai leads on our overall score (60/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (45/100 against 39/100), LinkedIn following (23,215 against 14,304).
Read the full Ruby Receptionists review and pricing or the Smith.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Ruby Receptionists alternatives we track.