Riverside.fm vs Working Progress
Riverside.fm vs Working Progress, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Riverside.fm is on 71/100 and Working Progress on 26/100.
Where each one leads
Riverside.fm
- our overall score: 71/100 against 26/100
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 50/100
Working Progress
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Riverside.fm | Working Progress |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | All-in-one platform for high-quality remote video and audio content creation. | An animation studio that creates short animations, visual explainers, and narrative films for mission-driven organizations. |
| Category | Voice AI, Conversational AI, Video Production, Podcast Production | Animation Studio, Video Production, Content Creation, Digital Storytelling |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2020 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Sheffield, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Riverside.fm | Working Progress |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 465 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +50.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $77.0M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series C | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 44,782 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Riverside.fm | Working Progress |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 71/100 | 26/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | Not published |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 65/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 78/100 | 42/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (56/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 83/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Riverside.fm | Working Progress |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Nuxt |
| Analytics | Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Riverside.fm | Working Progress |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 5 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Looking for alternatives to Riverside.fm. Any recommendations? I’ve been using Riverside.Fm for recording and editing for almost a year.”r/podcasting
Riverside.fm vs Working Progress: common questions
Which is better, Riverside.fm or Working Progress?
On our 0-100 score Riverside.fm rates higher (71/100 against 26/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Riverside.fm and Working Progress compare on the numbers?
Riverside.fm leads on our overall score (71/100 against 26/100), agent readiness (56/100 against 50/100).
What do real users say about Riverside.fm and Working Progress?
Riverside.fm: 0 positive and 5 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/podcasting.
Read the full Riverside.fm review and pricing or the Working Progress review and pricing. You can also browse other Riverside.fm alternatives we track.