Return Signals vs WooCommerce (Automattic)
Return Signals vs WooCommerce (Automattic), compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Return Signals is on 36/100 and WooCommerce (Automattic) on 76/100.
Where each one leads
Return Signals
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
WooCommerce (Automattic)
- our overall score: 76/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 10/100
- headcount: 207 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 47,166 against 386
At a glance
| Measure | Return Signals | WooCommerce (Automattic) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI luxury concierge for E-commerce brands | A free, open-source e-commerce plugin for WordPress, empowering businesses to build and manage online stores. |
| Category | Generative AI, E-commerce, SMS, Agentic AI | E-commerce, Marketplace, Platform, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2025 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Return Signals | WooCommerce (Automattic) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 207 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +6.0% |
| Total funding | Not published | $816M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $7.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | 386 | 47,166 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Return Signals | WooCommerce (Automattic) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 36/100 | 76/100 |
| Traction | 5/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 80/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 89/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 10/100 | 92/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Return Signals | WooCommerce (Automattic) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, PostHog | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Return Signals | WooCommerce (Automattic) |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
Return Signals vs WooCommerce (Automattic): common questions
Which is better, Return Signals or WooCommerce (Automattic)?
On our 0-100 score WooCommerce (Automattic) rates higher (76/100 against 36/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Return Signals and WooCommerce (Automattic) compare on the numbers?
WooCommerce (Automattic) leads on our overall score (76/100 against 36/100), domain rating (92/100 against 10/100), headcount (207 against 2), LinkedIn following (47,166 against 386).
Read the full Return Signals review and pricing or the WooCommerce (Automattic) review and pricing. You can also browse other Return Signals alternatives we track.