Responsive vs Temporal
Responsive vs Temporal, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Responsive is on 35/100 and Temporal on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Responsive
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Temporal
- our overall score: 62/100 against 35/100
- agent readiness: 59/100 against 27/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 29/100
- headcount: 496 against 8
- LinkedIn following: 31,564 against 1,027
At a glance
| Measure | Responsive | Temporal |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Platform for developers building stateful reactive applications on the modern cloud with object store native databases. | Open-source platform for reliable, scalable, and observable distributed applications. |
| Category | Enterprise, Development, Data, Developer Tools | Workflow Automation, Developer Tools, API Platform, Distributed Systems |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Seattle, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Responsive | Temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | 496 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $634M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $12B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,027 | 31,564 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Responsive | Temporal |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 35/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 10/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 10/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 58/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (27/100) | D (59/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 29/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Responsive | Temporal |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Sveltekit, Svelte, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Not detected | Discourse |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Responsive vs Temporal: common questions
Which is better, Responsive or Temporal?
On our 0-100 score Temporal rates higher (62/100 against 35/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Responsive and Temporal compare on the numbers?
Temporal leads on our overall score (62/100 against 35/100), agent readiness (59/100 against 27/100), domain rating (78/100 against 29/100), headcount (496 against 8), LinkedIn following (31,564 against 1,027).
Read the full Responsive review and pricing or the Temporal review and pricing. You can also browse other Responsive alternatives we track.