Red Access vs Salt Security
Red Access vs Salt Security, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Red Access is on 53/100 and Salt Security on 69/100.
Where each one leads
Red Access
- headcount growth: +29.3% against +0.3%
Salt Security
- our overall score: 69/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 30/100
- domain rating: 72/100 against 47/100
- headcount: 207 against 46
- funding raised: $270M against $17.0M
- LinkedIn following: 27,879 against 2,817
At a glance
| Measure | Red Access | Salt Security |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Red Access provides the first agentless unified platform to secure all the enterprise browsing activity, in the complexity of in-office and hybrid work. | API security platform using AI and big data to detect and prevent API attacks. |
| Category | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Web Browser, Web Security | Enterprise, Cybersecurity, Web Security, API |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2021 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Red Access | Salt Security |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 46 | 207 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.3% | +0.3% |
| Total funding | $17.0M | $270M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,817 | 27,879 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Red Access | Salt Security |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 53/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (30/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 47/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Red Access | Salt Security |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Red Access vs Salt Security: common questions
Which is better, Red Access or Salt Security?
On our 0-100 score Salt Security rates higher (69/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Red Access and Salt Security compare on the numbers?
Red Access leads on headcount growth (+29.3% against +0.3%). Salt Security leads on our overall score (69/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 30/100), domain rating (72/100 against 47/100), headcount (207 against 46), funding raised ($270M against $17.0M), LinkedIn following (27,879 against 2,817).
Read the full Red Access review and pricing or the Salt Security review and pricing. You can also browse other Red Access alternatives we track.