Re:amaze vs Riverside.fm
Re:amaze vs Riverside.fm, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Re:amaze is on 42/100 and Riverside.fm on 71/100.
Where each one leads
Re:amaze
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Riverside.fm
- our overall score: 71/100 against 42/100
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 46/100
At a glance
| Measure | Re:amaze | Riverside.fm |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Unified customer service platform for online businesses, integrating chat, email, and social media. | All-in-one platform for high-quality remote video and audio content creation. |
| Category | Customer Service Automation, Helpdesk Software, Live Chat, E-commerce | Voice AI, Conversational AI, Video Production, Podcast Production |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Montreal, Canada | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Re:amaze | Riverside.fm |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 465 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +50.5% |
| Total funding | Not published | $77.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 44,782 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Re:amaze | Riverside.fm |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 42/100 | 71/100 |
| Traction | 30/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 65/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Re:amaze | Riverside.fm |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment | Facebook Pixel |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
What users say
| Measure | Re:amaze | Riverside.fm |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 5 negative across 6 threads |
“Looking for alternatives to Riverside.fm. Any recommendations? I’ve been using Riverside.Fm for recording and editing for almost a year.”r/podcasting
Re:amaze vs Riverside.fm: common questions
Which is better, Re:amaze or Riverside.fm?
On our 0-100 score Riverside.fm rates higher (71/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Re:amaze and Riverside.fm compare on the numbers?
Riverside.fm leads on our overall score (71/100 against 42/100), agent readiness (56/100 against 46/100).
What do real users say about Re:amaze and Riverside.fm?
Riverside.fm: 0 positive and 5 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/podcasting.
Read the full Re:amaze review and pricing or the Riverside.fm review and pricing. You can also browse other Re:amaze alternatives we track.