Qumis vs Root
Qumis vs Root, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Qumis is on 55/100 and Root on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Qumis
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 33/100
Root
- our overall score: 63/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 3/100
- headcount: 1,197 against 18
- funding raised: $1.4B against $9.0M
- LinkedIn following: 52,266 against 1,647
At a glance
| Measure | Qumis | Root |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for analyzing commercial insurance policies with attorney-grade accuracy. | Root Inc. offers personalized car insurance based on driving behavior, managed via a mobile app. |
| Category | InsurTech, LegalTech, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance, Workflow Automation | InsurTech, Parametric Insurance, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance, Usage-Based Insurance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2022 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Columbus, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Qumis | Root |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 18 | 1,197 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +4.2% |
| Total funding | $9.0M | $1.4B |
| Latest round | Seed | Debt |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,647 | 52,266 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Qumis | Root |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 33/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 3/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Qumis | Root |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | AWS |
| CDN | Netlify | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Gatsby |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, PostHog | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
Qumis vs Root: common questions
Which is better, Qumis or Root?
On our 0-100 score Root rates higher (63/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Qumis and Root compare on the numbers?
Qumis leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 33/100). Root leads on our overall score (63/100 against 55/100), domain rating (73/100 against 3/100), headcount (1,197 against 18), funding raised ($1.4B against $9.0M), LinkedIn following (52,266 against 1,647).
Read the full Qumis review and pricing or the Root review and pricing. You can also browse other Qumis alternatives we track.