Qscanner vs Sourcegraph (Cody)
Qscanner vs Sourcegraph (Cody), compared side by side on 9 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Qscanner is on 8/100 and Sourcegraph (Cody) on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Qscanner
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 45/100
Sourcegraph (Cody)
- our overall score: 60/100 against 8/100
At a glance
| Measure | Qscanner | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Qscanner provides an AI-powered platform for automated code review and security vulnerability detection. | AI coding assistant that understands, writes, and fixes code faster using LLMs and code context. |
| Category | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Cybersecurity | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | Not published | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Qscanner | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | Not published | $301M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.6B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Qscanner | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 8/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | Not published | 40/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 32/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (61/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Qscanner | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Svelte |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Qscanner vs Sourcegraph (Cody): common questions
Which is better, Qscanner or Sourcegraph (Cody)?
On our 0-100 score Sourcegraph (Cody) rates higher (60/100 against 8/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 9 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Qscanner and Sourcegraph (Cody) compare on the numbers?
Qscanner leads on agent readiness (61/100 against 45/100). Sourcegraph (Cody) leads on our overall score (60/100 against 8/100).
Read the full Qscanner review and pricing or the Sourcegraph (Cody) review and pricing. You can also browse other Qscanner alternatives we track.