Qogita vs THREECOLTS
Qogita vs THREECOLTS, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Qogita is on 64/100 and THREECOLTS on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Qogita
- headcount growth: +21.7% against -13.0%
- funding raised: $114M against $91.0M
THREECOLTS
- agent readiness: 54/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 347 against 176
- LinkedIn following: 14,422 against 7,273
At a glance
| Measure | Qogita | THREECOLTS |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global B2B wholesale platform connecting retailers with brands for diverse product sourcing. | Unified operating system for commerce, simplifying operations for online sellers. |
| Category | E-commerce, Retail, Wholesale, Marketplace | E-commerce, Marketplace, Workflow Automation, RetailTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2021 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Qogita | THREECOLTS |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 176 | 347 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +21.7% | -13.0% |
| Total funding | $114M | $91.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,273 | 14,422 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Qogita | THREECOLTS |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 46/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (39/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 67/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Qogita | THREECOLTS |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Ghost | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Sveltekit, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom |
Qogita vs THREECOLTS: common questions
Which is better, Qogita or THREECOLTS?
On our 0-100 score Qogita rates higher (64/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Qogita and THREECOLTS compare on the numbers?
Qogita leads on headcount growth (+21.7% against -13.0%), funding raised ($114M against $91.0M). THREECOLTS leads on agent readiness (54/100 against 39/100), domain rating (67/100 against 51/100), headcount (347 against 176), LinkedIn following (14,422 against 7,273).
Read the full Qogita review and pricing or the THREECOLTS review and pricing. You can also browse other Qogita alternatives we track.