Pliops vs ScaleIO
Pliops vs ScaleIO, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Pliops is on 69/100 and ScaleIO on 61/100.
Where each one leads
Pliops
- our overall score: 69/100 against 61/100
- domain rating: 39/100 against 15/100
- headcount: 69 against 55
- funding raised: $205M against $12.0M
- LinkedIn following: 5,598 against 2,604
ScaleIO
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Pliops | ScaleIO |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Accelerating data access for cloud and enterprise data centers with innovative storage technology. | ScaleIO provides elastic converged storage software that reduces data center storage costs and streamlines operations. |
| Category | Storage, Data Center, Acceleration, Artificial Intelligence | Storage, Software Defined (SD), Enterprise, Data Center |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Santa Clara, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Pliops | ScaleIO |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 69 | 55 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -18.2% | Not published |
| Total funding | $205M | $12.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series A |
| Valuation | $670M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,598 | 2,604 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Pliops | ScaleIO |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 39/100 | 15/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Pliops | ScaleIO |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Pliops | ScaleIO |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“Ceph vs scaleio in home scenario. Hi im thinking about buying a few used servers or building a few PC's to store data on. I would like to build a cluster to store my data on but im not sure what i should use ceph or scaleio, i heard that sc”r/DataHoarder
Pliops vs ScaleIO: common questions
Which is better, Pliops or ScaleIO?
On our 0-100 score Pliops rates higher (69/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Pliops and ScaleIO compare on the numbers?
Pliops leads on our overall score (69/100 against 61/100), domain rating (39/100 against 15/100), headcount (69 against 55), funding raised ($205M against $12.0M), LinkedIn following (5,598 against 2,604).
What do real users say about Pliops and ScaleIO?
ScaleIO: 1 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/DataHoarder.
Read the full Pliops review and pricing or the ScaleIO review and pricing. You can also browse other Pliops alternatives we track.