Plaid vs Tink
Plaid vs Tink, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Plaid is on 70/100 and Tink on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Plaid
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 35/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 73/100
- headcount: 1,501 against 328
- headcount growth: +87.5% against -28.1%
- funding raised: $734M against $299M
- LinkedIn following: 245,610 against 65,102
Tink
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Plaid | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Plaid provides a data transfer network powering fintech and digital finance products. | European open banking platform enabling financial data access, payments, and financial service development. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Open Banking, Payments, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Plaid | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,501 | 328 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +87.5% | -28.1% |
| Total funding | $734M | $299M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | $13B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 245,610 | 65,102 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Plaid | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 54/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 86/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 86/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Plaid | Tink |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| CDN | CloudFront | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Segment | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Plaid vs Tink: common questions
Which is better, Plaid or Tink?
On our 0-100 score Plaid rates higher (70/100 against 67/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Plaid and Tink compare on the numbers?
Plaid leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 35/100), domain rating (86/100 against 73/100), headcount (1,501 against 328), headcount growth (+87.5% against -28.1%), funding raised ($734M against $299M), LinkedIn following (245,610 against 65,102).
Read the full Plaid review and pricing or the Tink review and pricing. You can also browse other Plaid alternatives we track.