Oura vs Ultrahuman
Oura vs Ultrahuman, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Oura is on 60/100 and Ultrahuman on 50/100.
Where each one leads
Oura
- our overall score: 60/100 against 50/100
- domain rating: 81/100 against 70/100
- headcount: 900 against 478
- funding raised: $3.5B against $159M
Ultrahuman
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 44/100
At a glance
| Measure | Oura | Ultrahuman |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Oura helps you turn mindful habits into a long, healthy life through its smart ring that tracks fitness, sleep, stress, and overall health. | Health technology company developing wearable devices and a platform for metabolic health and fitness tracking. |
| Category | Not published | HealthTech, Wearables, Metabolic Health, Continuous Glucose Monitoring |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Not published | Software | hardware | platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Oulu, Finland | Bengaluru, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Oura | Ultrahuman |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 900 | 478 |
| Total funding | $3.5B | $159M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| Valuation | $11B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 45,583 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Oura | Ultrahuman |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 41/100 | 6/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 81/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Oura | Ultrahuman |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | CloudFront | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Oura | Ultrahuman |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Sleep Tracking, Activity Tracking, Heart Rate Monitoring, Body Temperature Monitoring, Personalized Insights | Not published |
Oura vs Ultrahuman: common questions
Which is better, Oura or Ultrahuman?
On our 0-100 score Oura rates higher (60/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Oura and Ultrahuman compare on the numbers?
Oura leads on our overall score (60/100 against 50/100), domain rating (81/100 against 70/100), headcount (900 against 478), funding raised ($3.5B against $159M). Ultrahuman leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 44/100).
Read the full Oura review and pricing or the Ultrahuman review and pricing. You can also browse other Oura alternatives we track.