Otter.ai vs SoundHound AI
Otter.ai vs SoundHound AI, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Otter.ai is on 60/100 and SoundHound AI on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Otter.ai
- our overall score: 60/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 85/100 against 76/100
SoundHound AI
- headcount: 768 against 200
- funding raised: $588M against $40.0M
- LinkedIn following: 100,651 against 26,807
At a glance
| Measure | Otter.ai | SoundHound AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Otter.ai is the leading AI meeting agent empowering businesses to unlock the value of their meetings with real-time notes, summaries, and action items. | Voice and agentic AI platform enabling businesses to create conversational experiences. |
| Category | Not published | Agentic AI, Voice AI, Conversational AI, AI Agents |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Not published | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2005 |
| Headquarters | Not published | Santa Clara, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Otter.ai | SoundHound AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 200 | 768 |
| Total funding | $40.0M | $588M |
| Latest round | Not published | Post IPO |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 26,807 | 100,651 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Otter.ai | SoundHound AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 29/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 85/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Otter.ai | SoundHound AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Amplitude | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Drift | HubSpot |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Otter.ai | SoundHound AI |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI Meeting Notes, AI Summary, Action Item Assignment, Otter AI Chat, Sales Insights Extraction, Automated Workflows | Not published |
Otter.ai vs SoundHound AI: common questions
Which is better, Otter.ai or SoundHound AI?
On our 0-100 score Otter.ai rates higher (60/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Otter.ai and SoundHound AI compare on the numbers?
Otter.ai leads on our overall score (60/100 against 49/100), domain rating (85/100 against 76/100). SoundHound AI leads on headcount (768 against 200), funding raised ($588M against $40.0M), LinkedIn following (100,651 against 26,807).
Read the full Otter.ai review and pricing or the SoundHound AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Otter.ai alternatives we track.