OpenEyes Insurance vs Root Insurance
OpenEyes Insurance vs Root Insurance, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: OpenEyes Insurance is on 56/100 and Root Insurance on 61/100.
Where each one leads
OpenEyes Insurance
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Root Insurance
- our overall score: 61/100 against 56/100
- agent readiness: 33/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 73/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 1,188 against 35
- funding raised: $1.6B against $23.0M
- LinkedIn following: 51,959 against 591
At a glance
| Measure | OpenEyes Insurance | Root Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Commercial auto insurance leveraging technology to enhance fleet safety and reduce costs. | Root Insurance is a technology company revolutionizing car insurance through data science and automation. |
| Category | Automotive, Insurance, Fintech, Fleet | InsurTech, Auto Insurance, Renters Insurance, Homeowners Insurance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | Columbus, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | OpenEyes Insurance | Root Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 35 | 1,188 |
| Total funding | $23.0M | $1.6B |
| Latest round | Series A | Debt |
| Valuation | Not published | $7 |
| LinkedIn followers | 591 | 51,959 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | OpenEyes Insurance | Root Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 35/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | OpenEyes Insurance | Root Insurance |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | Wix | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Gatsby |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
OpenEyes Insurance vs Root Insurance: common questions
Which is better, OpenEyes Insurance or Root Insurance?
On our 0-100 score Root Insurance rates higher (61/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do OpenEyes Insurance and Root Insurance compare on the numbers?
Root Insurance leads on our overall score (61/100 against 56/100), agent readiness (33/100 against 21/100), domain rating (73/100 against 1/100), headcount (1,188 against 35), funding raised ($1.6B against $23.0M), LinkedIn following (51,959 against 591).
Read the full OpenEyes Insurance review and pricing or the Root Insurance review and pricing. You can also browse other OpenEyes Insurance alternatives we track.