OneStream vs Phocas
OneStream vs Phocas, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: OneStream is on 69/100 and Phocas on 62/100.
Where each one leads
OneStream
- our overall score: 69/100 against 62/100
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 1,651 against 334
- funding raised: $665M against $52.0M
- LinkedIn following: 58,369 against 38,687
Phocas
- headcount growth: +24.7% against +13.0%
At a glance
| Measure | OneStream | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Unified platform for financial planning, budgeting, forecasting, and reporting. | Integrated BI and FP&A platform for mid-market manufacturing, wholesale distribution, and retail. |
| Category | AI-Driven Finance, Analytics, Analytics Platform, Budgeting | Business Intelligence, Financial Planning & Analysis, Enterprise Software, Manufacturing Software |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Rochester, United States | Atlanta, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | OneStream | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,651 | 334 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +13.0% | +24.7% |
| Total funding | $665M | $52.0M |
| Latest round | Post-IPO Secondary | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 58,369 | 38,687 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | OneStream | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 69/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 40/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | OneStream | Phocas |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot, Discourse |
OneStream vs Phocas: common questions
Which is better, OneStream or Phocas?
On our 0-100 score OneStream rates higher (69/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do OneStream and Phocas compare on the numbers?
OneStream leads on our overall score (69/100 against 62/100), agent readiness (50/100 against 43/100), domain rating (71/100 against 58/100), headcount (1,651 against 334), funding raised ($665M against $52.0M), LinkedIn following (58,369 against 38,687). Phocas leads on headcount growth (+24.7% against +13.0%).
Read the full OneStream review and pricing or the Phocas review and pricing. You can also browse other OneStream alternatives we track.