Nucleus Security vs Tenable
Nucleus Security vs Tenable, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Nucleus Security is on 56/100 and Tenable on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Nucleus Security
- agent readiness: 64/100 against 51/100
- headcount: 123 against 24
- LinkedIn following: 17,516 against 8,859
Tenable
- our overall score: 62/100 against 56/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 60/100
- funding raised: $65.0M against $20.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Nucleus Security | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enterprise exposure management platform that centralizes and normalizes vulnerability, asset, and risk data. | Cybersecurity risk management platform that provides vulnerability management, attack surface management, and cloud security solutions. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Vulnerability Management, Exposure Management, IT Management | Cybersecurity, Vulnerability Management, Attack Surface Management, Cloud Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Columbia, United States | Columbia, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Nucleus Security | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 123 | 24 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -35.0% |
| Total funding | $20.0M | $65.0M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 17,516 | 8,859 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Nucleus Security | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 57/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (64/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 60/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Nucleus Security | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
What users say
| Measure | Nucleus Security | Tenable |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads |
“I read the latest announcement from #microsoft about the general availability of #MicrosoftTVM with #vulcancyber and here's a short video on the setup and configuration. Initial thoughts; excellent interface, rich information, massive libra”r/DefenderATP
Nucleus Security vs Tenable: common questions
Which is better, Nucleus Security or Tenable?
On our 0-100 score Tenable rates higher (62/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Nucleus Security and Tenable compare on the numbers?
Nucleus Security leads on agent readiness (64/100 against 51/100), headcount (123 against 24), LinkedIn following (17,516 against 8,859). Tenable leads on our overall score (62/100 against 56/100), domain rating (84/100 against 60/100), funding raised ($65.0M against $20.0M).
What do real users say about Nucleus Security and Tenable?
Tenable: 2 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/DefenderATP.
Read the full Nucleus Security review and pricing or the Tenable review and pricing. You can also browse other Nucleus Security alternatives we track.