Noma Security vs SonarQube
Noma Security vs SonarQube, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Noma Security is on 66/100 and SonarQube on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Noma Security
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
SonarQube
- domain rating: 84/100 against 67/100
- headcount: 930 against 131
- funding raised: $457M against $132M
- LinkedIn following: 39,612 against 10,650
At a glance
| Measure | Noma Security | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Platform securing the entire data and AI lifecycle from development to production. | Automated code quality and security analysis platform for developers and organizations. |
| Category | Enterprise, Software Development, Artificial Intelligence, Generative AI | Developer Tools, Code Quality, Code Security, DevOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Geneva, Switzerland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Noma Security | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 131 | 930 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +222.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $132M | $457M |
| Latest round | Series B | Growth |
| Valuation | Not published | $4.7B |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,650 | 39,612 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Noma Security | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 66/100 | 45/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (54/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Noma Security | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Netlify |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Noma Security | SonarQube |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 5 positive, 1 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Diana Kelley, CISO at Noma Security, discussed the growing threat of indirect prompt injection - where attacker-controlled text can poison AI models or even turn simple documents into covert attack instructions. She explains how shadow AI a”r/TechNadu
Noma Security vs SonarQube: common questions
Which is better, Noma Security or SonarQube?
On our 0-100 score SonarQube rates higher (67/100 against 66/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Noma Security and SonarQube compare on the numbers?
SonarQube leads on domain rating (84/100 against 67/100), headcount (930 against 131), funding raised ($457M against $132M), LinkedIn following (39,612 against 10,650).
What do real users say about Noma Security and SonarQube?
Noma Security: 5 positive and 1 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/TechNadu.
Read the full Noma Security review and pricing or the SonarQube review and pricing. You can also browse other Noma Security alternatives we track.