Noma Security vs Protect AI
Noma Security vs Protect AI, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Noma Security is on 66/100 and Protect AI on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Noma Security
- our overall score: 66/100 against 58/100
- headcount: 131 against 33
- funding raised: $132M against $105M
Protect AI
- domain rating: 88/100 against 67/100
- LinkedIn following: 22,513 against 10,650
At a glance
| Measure | Noma Security | Protect AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Platform securing the entire data and AI lifecycle from development to production. | Cybersecurity company focused on securing AI and ML systems with innovative MLSecOps products. |
| Category | Enterprise, Software Development, Artificial Intelligence, Generative AI | Cybersecurity, MLOps, AI Safety, AI Governance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2023 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Seattle, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Noma Security | Protect AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 131 | 33 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +222.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $132M | $105M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 10,650 | 22,513 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Noma Security | Protect AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 66/100 | 49/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 88/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Noma Security | Protect AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | No | Yes, 6,500 GitHub stars |
What users say
| Measure | Noma Security | Protect AI |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 5 positive, 1 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“Diana Kelley, CISO at Noma Security, discussed the growing threat of indirect prompt injection - where attacker-controlled text can poison AI models or even turn simple documents into covert attack instructions. She explains how shadow AI a”r/TechNadu
Noma Security vs Protect AI: common questions
Which is better, Noma Security or Protect AI?
On our 0-100 score Noma Security rates higher (66/100 against 58/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Noma Security and Protect AI compare on the numbers?
Noma Security leads on our overall score (66/100 against 58/100), headcount (131 against 33), funding raised ($132M against $105M). Protect AI leads on domain rating (88/100 against 67/100), LinkedIn following (22,513 against 10,650).
What do real users say about Noma Security and Protect AI?
Noma Security: 5 positive and 1 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/TechNadu.
Read the full Noma Security review and pricing or the Protect AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Noma Security alternatives we track.