NoBroker vs Zefir
NoBroker vs Zefir, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: NoBroker is on 67/100 and Zefir on 27/100.
Where each one leads
NoBroker
- our overall score: 67/100 against 27/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 40/100
- headcount: 5,883 against 124
- funding raised: $369M against $27.2M
- LinkedIn following: 366,402 against 7,930
Zefir
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | NoBroker | Zefir |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | NoBroker is an Indian proptech company that runs a real estate marketplace. Contrary to its original motives, the company began charging property owners a subsc | AI-powered real estate marketplace simplifying property transactions for buyers and sellers. |
| Category | Proptech, Real Estate, Marketplace, Consumer App | Proptech, Real Estate, AI, Marketplace |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Marketplace | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Bengaluru, India | Paris, France |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | NoBroker | Zefir |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5,883 | 124 |
| Open roles | Not published | 10 |
| Total funding | $369M | $27.2M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 366,402 | 7,930 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | NoBroker | Zefir |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 27/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 6/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 3/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (51/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | 40/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | NoBroker | Zefir |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
NoBroker vs Zefir: common questions
Which is better, NoBroker or Zefir?
On our 0-100 score NoBroker rates higher (67/100 against 27/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do NoBroker and Zefir compare on the numbers?
NoBroker leads on our overall score (67/100 against 27/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 31/100), domain rating (69/100 against 40/100), headcount (5,883 against 124), funding raised ($369M against $27.2M), LinkedIn following (366,402 against 7,930).
Read the full NoBroker review and pricing or the Zefir review and pricing. You can also browse other NoBroker alternatives we track.