Nexar vs Trieye
Nexar vs Trieye, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Nexar is on 61/100 and Trieye on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Nexar
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 38/100
- headcount: 142 against 101
- funding raised: $150M against $96.0M
- LinkedIn following: 16,954 against 10,032
Trieye
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Nexar | Trieye |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Operates the world's largest open video driving dataset for AI and real-time road intelligence. | Pioneering mass-market CMOS-based Short-Wave Infrared (SWIR) sensing for automotive imaging. |
| Category | Automotive, ADAS, Autonomous, Camera | Automotive, Imaging, ADAS, Camera |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C, B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Nexar | Trieye |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 142 | 101 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -1.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $150M | $96.0M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 16,954 | 10,032 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Nexar | Trieye |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Nexar | Trieye |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
Nexar vs Trieye: common questions
Which is better, Nexar or Trieye?
On our 0-100 score Trieye rates higher (63/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Nexar and Trieye compare on the numbers?
Nexar leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 38/100), headcount (142 against 101), funding raised ($150M against $96.0M), LinkedIn following (16,954 against 10,032).
Read the full Nexar review and pricing or the Trieye review and pricing. You can also browse other Nexar alternatives we track.