Mercury vs PEX
Mercury vs PEX, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mercury is on 67/100 and PEX on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Mercury
- our overall score: 67/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 54/100
- funding raised: $500M against $160M
PEX
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Mercury | PEX |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Business banking. | Integrated payments, credit, and spend management platform for businesses. |
| Category | Fintech, Neobank, Payments, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Financial Services, Payments, Corporate Cards |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mercury | PEX |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,722 | Not published |
| Total funding | $500M | $160M |
| Latest round | Series D | Funding Round |
| Valuation | $5.2B | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mercury | PEX |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 19/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mercury | PEX |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Mercury | PEX |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 2 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads |
“Even taking out all the positives of pex piping, it's insanely easy to install and cheap. Why are builders not just using pex? Seems like they'd save/make more money and be doing less work. Why use copper or CPVC over pex?”r/Plumbing
Mercury vs PEX: common questions
Which is better, Mercury or PEX?
On our 0-100 score Mercury rates higher (67/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mercury and PEX compare on the numbers?
Mercury leads on our overall score (67/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 42/100), domain rating (78/100 against 54/100), funding raised ($500M against $160M).
What do real users say about Mercury and PEX?
PEX: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Plumbing.
Read the full Mercury review and pricing or the PEX review and pricing. You can also browse other Mercury alternatives we track.