Mastra vs Protocol
Mastra vs Protocol, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mastra is on 77/100 and Protocol on 47/100.
Where each one leads
Mastra
- our overall score: 77/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 60/100
- funding raised: $35.5M against $3.2M
Protocol
- headcount: 109 against 53
- LinkedIn following: 35,452 against 6,591
At a glance
| Measure | Mastra | Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. | Protocol Labs is an innovation network driving breakthroughs in computing to push humanity forward. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source | Agentic AI, AI Agent, Foundation Model, API Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2024 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mastra | Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 53 | 109 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +204.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $35.5M | $3.2M |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,591 | 35,452 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mastra | Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 70/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | Not published |
| Community | 38/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 68/100 | 27/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 60/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mastra | Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Mastra | Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Mastra | Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Mastra vs Protocol: common questions
Which is better, Mastra or Protocol?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (77/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mastra and Protocol compare on the numbers?
Mastra leads on our overall score (77/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 36/100), domain rating (76/100 against 60/100), funding raised ($35.5M against $3.2M). Protocol leads on headcount (109 against 53), LinkedIn following (35,452 against 6,591).
Read the full Mastra review and pricing or the Protocol review and pricing. You can also browse other Mastra alternatives we track.