Magic vs Sourcegraph (Cody)
Magic vs Sourcegraph (Cody), compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Magic is on 65/100 and Sourcegraph (Cody) on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Magic
- our overall score: 65/100 against 60/100
Sourcegraph (Cody)
- domain rating: 80/100 against 56/100
- funding raised: $301M against $10.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Magic | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered coding agents for automated software engineering tasks. | AI coding assistant that understands, writes, and fixes code faster using LLMs and code context. |
| Category | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model | AI Coding Assistant, AI Copilot, Developer Tools, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Magic | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 37 | Not published |
| Open roles | 10 | Not published |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $301M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series D |
| Valuation | $1.5B | $2.6B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Magic | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 65/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 51/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 56/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Magic | Sourcegraph (Cody) |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Svelte |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Magic vs Sourcegraph (Cody): common questions
Which is better, Magic or Sourcegraph (Cody)?
On our 0-100 score Magic rates higher (65/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Magic and Sourcegraph (Cody) compare on the numbers?
Magic leads on our overall score (65/100 against 60/100). Sourcegraph (Cody) leads on domain rating (80/100 against 56/100), funding raised ($301M against $10.0M).
Read the full Magic review and pricing or the Sourcegraph (Cody) review and pricing. You can also browse other Magic alternatives we track.