M-Systems vs Wiliot
M-Systems vs Wiliot, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: M-Systems is on 32/100 and Wiliot on 69/100.
Where each one leads
M-Systems
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Wiliot
- our overall score: 69/100 against 32/100
- funding raised: $344M against $10.0M
At a glance
| Measure | M-Systems | Wiliot |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Pioneering flash memory technology and USB flash drives, later acquired by SanDisk. | Wiliot provides self-powered IoT Pixels that bring connectivity and intelligence to everyday products. |
| Category | Flash Memory, USB Flash Drive, Semiconductor, Hardware | IoT, Energy, Radio Frequency, Semiconductor |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 1989 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | M-Systems | Wiliot |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 265 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +15.4% |
| Total funding | $10.0M | $344M |
| Latest round | Venture Round | Strategic Investment |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 16,525 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | M-Systems | Wiliot |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 32/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 35/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 3/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | Not published | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 58/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | M-Systems | Wiliot |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
M-Systems vs Wiliot: common questions
Which is better, M-Systems or Wiliot?
On our 0-100 score Wiliot rates higher (69/100 against 32/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do M-Systems and Wiliot compare on the numbers?
Wiliot leads on our overall score (69/100 against 32/100), funding raised ($344M against $10.0M).
Read the full M-Systems review and pricing or the Wiliot review and pricing. You can also browse other M-Systems alternatives we track.