M-KOPA vs Wamo
M-KOPA vs Wamo, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: M-KOPA is on 63/100 and Wamo on 54/100.
Where each one leads
M-KOPA
- our overall score: 63/100 against 54/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 42/100
- headcount: 3,269 against 122
- funding raised: $325M against $15.0M
- LinkedIn following: 86,854 against 10,949
Wamo
- agent readiness: 55/100 against 42/100
At a glance
| Measure | M-KOPA | Wamo |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Fintech platform providing affordable smartphones and digital financial services to 'Every Day Earners' in Sub-Saharan Africa. | A financial operating platform for SMEs with integrated lending and AI-driven tools. |
| Category | Fintech, Embedded Finance, Payments, Consumer Electronics | Fintech, Financial Services, Payments, Digital Payments |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2010 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Helsinki, Finland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | M-KOPA | Wamo |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,269 | 122 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +9.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $325M | $15.0M |
| Latest round | Debt and Equity | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 86,854 | 10,949 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | M-KOPA | Wamo |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 56/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (55/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 42/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | M-KOPA | Wamo |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Framer |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Google Tag Manager |
M-KOPA vs Wamo: common questions
Which is better, M-KOPA or Wamo?
On our 0-100 score M-KOPA rates higher (63/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do M-KOPA and Wamo compare on the numbers?
M-KOPA leads on our overall score (63/100 against 54/100), domain rating (62/100 against 42/100), headcount (3,269 against 122), funding raised ($325M against $15.0M), LinkedIn following (86,854 against 10,949). Wamo leads on agent readiness (55/100 against 42/100).
Read the full M-KOPA review and pricing or the Wamo review and pricing. You can also browse other M-KOPA alternatives we track.