Immo-Pop vs NoBroker
Immo-Pop vs NoBroker, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Immo-Pop is on 31/100 and NoBroker on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Immo-Pop
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
NoBroker
- our overall score: 67/100 against 31/100
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 25/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 5,883 against 4
- LinkedIn following: 366,402 against 620
At a glance
| Measure | Immo-Pop | NoBroker |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Immo-Pop provides a comprehensive real estate management platform for professionals, streamlining property listings, client management, and transaction processes. | NoBroker is an Indian proptech company that runs a real estate marketplace. Contrary to its original motives, the company began charging property owners a subsc |
| Category | Proptech, Real Estate Software, ERP Software, Property Management | Proptech, Real Estate, Marketplace, Consumer App |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Marketplace |
| Founded | 2021 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Bengaluru, India |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Immo-Pop | NoBroker |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 4 | 5,883 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -37.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $369M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series E |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 620 | 366,402 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Immo-Pop | NoBroker |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 31/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 7/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 59/100 | 69/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Immo-Pop | NoBroker |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Linode | Google Cloud |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Immo-Pop | NoBroker |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 3 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“Kubeshark: The API Traffic Viewer for Kubernetes. Kubeshark (formerly Mizu) is an observability and monitoring tool that captures all the network traffic inside a Kubernetes cluster , including ingress, egress and across containers and pods”r/kubernetes
Immo-Pop vs NoBroker: common questions
Which is better, Immo-Pop or NoBroker?
On our 0-100 score NoBroker rates higher (67/100 against 31/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Immo-Pop and NoBroker compare on the numbers?
NoBroker leads on our overall score (67/100 against 31/100), agent readiness (51/100 against 25/100), domain rating (69/100 against 59/100), headcount (5,883 against 4), LinkedIn following (366,402 against 620).
What do real users say about Immo-Pop and NoBroker?
Immo-Pop: 3 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/kubernetes.
Read the full Immo-Pop review and pricing or the NoBroker review and pricing. You can also browse other Immo-Pop alternatives we track.