Kata.ai vs Starling Bank
Kata.ai vs Starling Bank, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Kata.ai is on 55/100 and Starling Bank on 65/100.
Where each one leads
Kata.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Starling Bank
- our overall score: 65/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 48/100
- headcount: 1,000 against 88
- funding raised: $742M against $3.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Kata.ai | Starling Bank |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops enterprise-grade chatbots and AI agents for customer interactions. | A UK challenger bank offering a digital-first banking experience with a focus on innovative AI-powered financial tools. |
| Category | Customer Service, AI Agents | Fintech, Banking, Artificial Intelligence, Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Jakarta, Indonesia | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Kata.ai | Starling Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 88 | 1,000 |
| Total funding | $3.5M | $742M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $3.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 45,860 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Kata.ai | Starling Bank |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 65/100 |
| Traction | 52/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 48/100 | 76/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Kata.ai | Starling Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
| CMS | Framer | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4 | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Kata.ai vs Starling Bank: common questions
Which is better, Kata.ai or Starling Bank?
On our 0-100 score Starling Bank rates higher (65/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Kata.ai and Starling Bank compare on the numbers?
Starling Bank leads on our overall score (65/100 against 55/100), domain rating (76/100 against 48/100), headcount (1,000 against 88), funding raised ($742M against $3.5M).
Read the full Kata.ai review and pricing or the Starling Bank review and pricing. You can also browse other Kata.ai alternatives we track.