Search Machines vs Metadata.io
Search Machines vs Metadata.io, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Search Machines is on 27/100 and Metadata.io on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Search Machines
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Metadata.io
- our overall score: 58/100 against 27/100
- domain rating: 70/100 against 1/100
- headcount: 140 against 19
- LinkedIn following: 26,476 against 1,386
At a glance
| Measure | Search Machines | Metadata.io |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Developing the ATLAS Marketing Platform for performance and automation using AI, with operations in Israel and the UK. | B2B marketing platform automating paid campaigns, web personalization, and revenue optimization. |
| Category | Marketing, MarTech, AdTech, Marketing Automation | Marketing, Platform, Prospecting, CRM |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Not published | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Search Machines | Metadata.io |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 19 | 140 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +29.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | Not published | $70.2M |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,386 | 26,476 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Search Machines | Metadata.io |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 27/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 13/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (53/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 1/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Search Machines | Metadata.io |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | AWS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Search Machines vs Metadata.io: common questions
Which is better, Search Machines or Metadata.io?
On our 0-100 score Metadata.io rates higher (58/100 against 27/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Search Machines and Metadata.io compare on the numbers?
Metadata.io leads on our overall score (58/100 against 27/100), domain rating (70/100 against 1/100), headcount (140 against 19), LinkedIn following (26,476 against 1,386).
Read the full Search Machines review and pricing or the Metadata.io review and pricing. You can also browse other Search Machines alternatives we track.