ironSource vs Replay Technologies
ironSource vs Replay Technologies, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ironSource is on 76/100 and Replay Technologies on 47/100.
Where each one leads
ironSource
- our overall score: 76/100 against 47/100
- funding raised: $505M against $22.5M
Replay Technologies
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | ironSource | Replay Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Unity is a leading platform for creating and operating real-time 3D content, empowering developers across gaming, film, automotive, and architecture. | Develops 3D video reconstruction technology for immersive viewing experiences. |
| Category | Advertising, Marketing, Mobile, Real-Time Bidding | Computer Vision, 3D Reconstruction, Immersive Technology, Sports Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2011 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ironSource | Replay Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 66 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -45.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $505M | $22.5M |
| Latest round | Private Equity | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 122,997 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ironSource | Replay Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 37/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 88/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ironSource | Replay Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Khoros |
What users say
| Measure | ironSource | Replay Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 5 negative across 5 threads | 0 positive, 2 negative across 2 threads |
“Unity to sell Supersonic and shut down ironSource. Hadn't seen this mentioned anywhere here or on unity forums.”r/Unity3D
“[Highlight] Cavaliers show off their C-View 3D replay technology... it's questionable graphics put a fans face in the basket on Evan Mobley's dunk.”r/nba
ironSource vs Replay Technologies: common questions
Which is better, ironSource or Replay Technologies?
On our 0-100 score ironSource rates higher (76/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ironSource and Replay Technologies compare on the numbers?
ironSource leads on our overall score (76/100 against 47/100), funding raised ($505M against $22.5M).
What do real users say about ironSource and Replay Technologies?
ironSource: 0 positive and 5 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Unity3D. Replay Technologies: 0 positive and 2 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/nba.
Read the full ironSource review and pricing or the Replay Technologies review and pricing. You can also browse other ironSource alternatives we track.