ironSource vs Quixey
ironSource vs Quixey, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: ironSource is on 76/100 and Quixey on 47/100.
Where each one leads
ironSource
- our overall score: 76/100 against 47/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 39/100
- headcount: 66 against 29
- funding raised: $505M against $164M
- LinkedIn following: 122,997 against 9,591
Quixey
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | ironSource | Quixey |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Unity is a leading platform for creating and operating real-time 3D content, empowering developers across gaming, film, automotive, and architecture. | Quixey pioneered deep mobile search, connecting users to instant actions within apps for quick task completion. |
| Category | Advertising, Marketing, Mobile, Real-Time Bidding | Search, Mobile, App, Mobile Search |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2011 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Mountain View, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | ironSource | Quixey |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 66 | 29 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -45.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $505M | $164M |
| Latest round | Private Equity | Debt |
| Valuation | $1.0B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 122,997 | 9,591 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | ironSource | Quixey |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 47/100 |
| Traction | 58/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 39/100 | 25/100 |
| Quality | 88/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 39/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | ironSource | Quixey |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CMS | Ghost | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | ironSource | Quixey |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 5 negative across 5 threads | 1 positive, 1 negative across 2 threads |
“Unity to sell Supersonic and shut down ironSource. Hadn't seen this mentioned anywhere here or on unity forums.”r/Unity3D
“[DEV] Quixey: app search that finds apps by what they do.”r/androidapps
ironSource vs Quixey: common questions
Which is better, ironSource or Quixey?
On our 0-100 score ironSource rates higher (76/100 against 47/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do ironSource and Quixey compare on the numbers?
ironSource leads on our overall score (76/100 against 47/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 22/100), domain rating (91/100 against 39/100), headcount (66 against 29), funding raised ($505M against $164M), LinkedIn following (122,997 against 9,591).
What do real users say about ironSource and Quixey?
ironSource: 0 positive and 5 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Unity3D. Quixey: 1 positive and 1 negative mentions across 2 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/androidapps.
Read the full ironSource review and pricing or the Quixey review and pricing. You can also browse other ironSource alternatives we track.