IQM vs Q-Factor
IQM vs Q-Factor, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IQM is on 58/100 and Q-Factor on 43/100.
Where each one leads
IQM
- our overall score: 58/100 against 43/100
- domain rating: 69/100 against 2/100
- funding raised: $516M against $24.0M
Q-Factor
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 37/100
At a glance
| Measure | IQM | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Quantum computer hardware and software developer for various industries. | Q-Factor is a quantum computing startup developing a neutral atom-based quantum computer architecture designed to scale to one million qubits and beyond. |
| Category | Quantum Computing, AI Chip, AI Hardware, Semiconductor | Quantum Computing, AI Hardware, Microelectronics & Photonics Solutions, Deep Tech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2018 | 2026 |
| Headquarters | Espoo, Finland | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IQM | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 13 |
| Total funding | $516M | $24.0M |
| Latest round | PIPE | Seed |
| Valuation | $2K | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 1,182 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IQM | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 58/100 | 43/100 |
| Traction | 13/100 | 48/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 50/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (37/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 69/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IQM | Q-Factor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Lovable |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
IQM vs Q-Factor: common questions
Which is better, IQM or Q-Factor?
On our 0-100 score IQM rates higher (58/100 against 43/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IQM and Q-Factor compare on the numbers?
IQM leads on our overall score (58/100 against 43/100), domain rating (69/100 against 2/100), funding raised ($516M against $24.0M). Q-Factor leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 37/100).
Read the full IQM review and pricing or the Q-Factor review and pricing. You can also browse other IQM alternatives we track.