InsideView vs Lusha
InsideView vs Lusha, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: InsideView is on 42/100 and Lusha on 70/100.
Where each one leads
InsideView
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 47/100
Lusha
- our overall score: 70/100 against 42/100
- funding raised: $245M against $88.9M
At a glance
| Measure | InsideView | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | B2B go-to-market intelligence platform for sales and marketing teams. | B2B contact data platform for sales and marketing professionals to find and engage leads. |
| Category | Sales Intelligence, Marketing Intelligence, B2B Data, Account-Based Marketing | Enterprise, Sales, Intelligence, Contact Data Provider |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2005 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | InsideView | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 358 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +3.7% |
| Total funding | $88.9M | $245M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.5B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 66,037 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | InsideView | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 42/100 | 70/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 8/100 | 52/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (56/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 80/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | InsideView | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
InsideView vs Lusha: common questions
Which is better, InsideView or Lusha?
On our 0-100 score Lusha rates higher (70/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do InsideView and Lusha compare on the numbers?
InsideView leads on agent readiness (56/100 against 47/100). Lusha leads on our overall score (70/100 against 42/100), funding raised ($245M against $88.9M).
Read the full InsideView review and pricing or the Lusha review and pricing. You can also browse other InsideView alternatives we track.