Innoviz Technologies vs Trieye
Innoviz Technologies vs Trieye, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Innoviz Technologies is on 63/100 and Trieye on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Innoviz Technologies
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 58/100 against 36/100
- headcount: 470 against 101
- funding raised: $317M against $96.0M
- LinkedIn following: 39,359 against 10,032
Trieye
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Innoviz Technologies | Trieye |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global leader in automotive LiDAR technology for safe autonomous vehicles. | Pioneering mass-market CMOS-based Short-Wave Infrared (SWIR) sensing for automotive imaging. |
| Category | Automotive, ADAS, Autonomous, LIDAR | Automotive, Imaging, ADAS, Camera |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Innoviz Technologies | Trieye |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 470 | 101 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +4.9% | Not published |
| Total funding | $317M | $96.0M |
| Latest round | Post-IPO | Series B |
| Valuation | $575M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 39,359 | 10,032 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Innoviz Technologies | Trieye |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 58/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Innoviz Technologies | Trieye |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
Innoviz Technologies vs Trieye: common questions
Which is better, Innoviz Technologies or Trieye?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 18 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do Innoviz Technologies and Trieye compare on the numbers?
Innoviz Technologies leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 38/100), domain rating (58/100 against 36/100), headcount (470 against 101), funding raised ($317M against $96.0M), LinkedIn following (39,359 against 10,032).
Read the full Innoviz Technologies review and pricing or the Trieye review and pricing. You can also browse other Innoviz Technologies alternatives we track.