Inneractive vs ironSource
Inneractive vs ironSource, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Inneractive is on 44/100 and ironSource on 76/100.
Where each one leads
Inneractive
- headcount growth: +500.0% against -45.5%
ironSource
- our overall score: 76/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 66 against 10
- funding raised: $505M against $11.8M
- LinkedIn following: 122,997 against 3,807
At a glance
| Measure | Inneractive | ironSource |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Inneractive was a mobile ad exchange and monetization platform for app developers and publishers, acquired by Fyber in 2016. | Unity is a leading platform for creating and operating real-time 3D content, empowering developers across gaming, film, automotive, and architecture. |
| Category | Mobile, Monetization, App, Advertising | Advertising, Marketing, Mobile, Real-Time Bidding |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2006 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Inneractive | ironSource |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 10 | 66 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | -45.5% |
| Total funding | $11.8M | $505M |
| Latest round | Series C | Private Equity |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,807 | 122,997 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Inneractive | ironSource |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 44/100 | 76/100 |
| Traction | 45/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 45/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | Not published | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Inneractive | ironSource |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Azure |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
What users say
| Measure | Inneractive | ironSource |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 5 negative across 5 threads |
“Unity to sell Supersonic and shut down ironSource. Hadn't seen this mentioned anywhere here or on unity forums.”r/Unity3D
Inneractive vs ironSource: common questions
Which is better, Inneractive or ironSource?
On our 0-100 score ironSource rates higher (76/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Inneractive and ironSource compare on the numbers?
Inneractive leads on headcount growth (+500.0% against -45.5%). ironSource leads on our overall score (76/100 against 44/100), headcount (66 against 10), funding raised ($505M against $11.8M), LinkedIn following (122,997 against 3,807).
What do real users say about Inneractive and ironSource?
ironSource: 0 positive and 5 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Unity3D.
Read the full Inneractive review and pricing or the ironSource review and pricing. You can also browse other Inneractive alternatives we track.