IFTTT vs Trigger Device Inc
IFTTT vs Trigger Device Inc, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: IFTTT is on 55/100 and Trigger Device Inc on 59/100.
Where each one leads
IFTTT
- agent readiness: 67/100 against 58/100
- domain rating: 87/100 against 72/100
- headcount: 46 against 11
- funding raised: $62.5M against $16.5M
- LinkedIn following: 12,207 against 2,770
Trigger Device Inc
- our overall score: 59/100 against 55/100
At a glance
| Measure | IFTTT | Trigger Device Inc |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | IFTTT connects your apps and devices to automate tasks and create new experiences. | An open-source platform for building and deploying AI agents and workflows. |
| Category | Workflow Automation, API Platform, Internet of Things, Smart Home | AI Agents, Workflow Automation, Developer Tools, Open Source |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2022 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | IFTTT | Trigger Device Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 46 | 11 |
| Total funding | $62.5M | $16.5M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,207 | 2,770 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | IFTTT | Trigger Device Inc |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 59/100 |
| Traction | 56/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | C (67/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 87/100 | 72/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | IFTTT | Trigger Device Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | AWS | Vercel |
| CDN | CloudFront | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Notion | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Segment |
| Open source | No | Yes |
| Self-hostable | No | Yes |
IFTTT vs Trigger Device Inc: common questions
Which is better, IFTTT or Trigger Device Inc?
On our 0-100 score Trigger Device Inc rates higher (59/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do IFTTT and Trigger Device Inc compare on the numbers?
IFTTT leads on agent readiness (67/100 against 58/100), domain rating (87/100 against 72/100), headcount (46 against 11), funding raised ($62.5M against $16.5M), LinkedIn following (12,207 against 2,770). Trigger Device Inc leads on our overall score (59/100 against 55/100).
Read the full IFTTT review and pricing or the Trigger Device Inc review and pricing. You can also browse other IFTTT alternatives we track.