Ibex Medical Analytics vs Viz.ai
Ibex Medical Analytics vs Viz.ai, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Ibex Medical Analytics is on 64/100 and Viz.ai on 74/100.
Where each one leads
Ibex Medical Analytics
- headcount growth: +17.3% against -4.9%
Viz.ai
- our overall score: 74/100 against 64/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 31/100
- domain rating: 68/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 331 against 99
- funding raised: $292M against $104M
- LinkedIn following: 48,917 against 14,109
At a glance
| Measure | Ibex Medical Analytics | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for cancer diagnostics in digital pathology. | AI-powered care coordination platform for faster diagnosis and treatment of critical conditions. |
| Category | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Pathology, HealthTech | Healthcare, Medical Imaging, Strokes, Healthcare AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Ibex Medical Analytics | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 99 | 331 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +17.3% | -4.9% |
| Total funding | $104M | $292M |
| Latest round | Series C | Series C |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.2B |
| LinkedIn followers | 14,109 | 48,917 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Ibex Medical Analytics | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 64/100 | 74/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 20/100 |
| Search visibility | 34/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 70/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (31/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 52/100 | 68/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Ibex Medical Analytics | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | Intercom |
What users say
| Measure | Ibex Medical Analytics | Viz.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | Not published | 5.0/5 from 1 vote |
Ibex Medical Analytics vs Viz.ai: common questions
Which is better, Ibex Medical Analytics or Viz.ai?
On our 0-100 score Viz.ai rates higher (74/100 against 64/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Ibex Medical Analytics and Viz.ai compare on the numbers?
Ibex Medical Analytics leads on headcount growth (+17.3% against -4.9%). Viz.ai leads on our overall score (74/100 against 64/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 31/100), domain rating (68/100 against 52/100), headcount (331 against 99), funding raised ($292M against $104M), LinkedIn following (48,917 against 14,109).
Read the full Ibex Medical Analytics review and pricing or the Viz.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Ibex Medical Analytics alternatives we track.