Honeycomb Insurance vs Root
Honeycomb Insurance vs Root, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Honeycomb Insurance is on 63/100 and Root on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Honeycomb Insurance
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 33/100
- headcount growth: +500.0% against +4.2%
Root
- domain rating: 73/100 against 49/100
- headcount: 1,197 against 204
- funding raised: $1.4B against $90.7M
- LinkedIn following: 52,266 against 7,682
At a glance
| Measure | Honeycomb Insurance | Root |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered insurance platform for real estate, offering customized policies at competitive rates. | Root Inc. offers personalized car insurance based on driving behavior, managed via a mobile app. |
| Category | InsurTech, Parametric Insurance, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance, Real Estate Tech | InsurTech, Parametric Insurance, AI-Driven Parametric Insurance, Usage-Based Insurance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2019 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, United States | Columbus, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Honeycomb Insurance | Root |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 204 | 1,197 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | +4.2% |
| Total funding | $90.7M | $1.4B |
| Latest round | Series B | Debt |
| LinkedIn followers | 7,682 | 52,266 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Honeycomb Insurance | Root |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 32/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 49/100 | 73/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Honeycomb Insurance | Root |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Gatsby |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
Honeycomb Insurance vs Root: common questions
Which is better, Honeycomb Insurance or Root?
Both score the same on our 0-100 rating, so the choice comes down to the 21 data points in the tables above rather than overall company strength.
How do Honeycomb Insurance and Root compare on the numbers?
Honeycomb Insurance leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 33/100), headcount growth (+500.0% against +4.2%). Root leads on domain rating (73/100 against 49/100), headcount (1,197 against 204), funding raised ($1.4B against $90.7M), LinkedIn following (52,266 against 7,682).
Read the full Honeycomb Insurance review and pricing or the Root review and pricing. You can also browse other Honeycomb Insurance alternatives we track.