HaptX vs ironSource
HaptX vs ironSource, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: HaptX is on 34/100 and ironSource on 76/100.
Where each one leads
HaptX
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
ironSource
- our overall score: 76/100 against 34/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 54/100
- funding raised: $505M against $74.6M
At a glance
| Measure | HaptX | ironSource |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | HaptX develops advanced haptic gloves for realistic touch feedback in VR and robotics. | Unity is a leading platform for creating and operating real-time 3D content, empowering developers across gaming, film, automotive, and architecture. |
| Category | Haptic Feedback, Neurotech & HCI, Robotics, AR VR | Advertising, Marketing, Mobile, Real-Time Bidding |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Luis Obispo, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | HaptX | ironSource |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 66 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -45.5% |
| Total funding | $74.6M | $505M |
| Latest round | Grant (prize money) | Private Equity |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 122,997 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | HaptX | ironSource |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 34/100 | 76/100 |
| Traction | 39/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | Not published | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 18/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 88/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 54/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | HaptX | ironSource |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Azure |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Support stack | Not detected | Zendesk |
What users say
| Measure | HaptX | ironSource |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 5 negative across 5 threads |
“Unity to sell Supersonic and shut down ironSource. Hadn't seen this mentioned anywhere here or on unity forums.”r/Unity3D
HaptX vs ironSource: common questions
Which is better, HaptX or ironSource?
On our 0-100 score ironSource rates higher (76/100 against 34/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do HaptX and ironSource compare on the numbers?
ironSource leads on our overall score (76/100 against 34/100), domain rating (91/100 against 54/100), funding raised ($505M against $74.6M).
What do real users say about HaptX and ironSource?
ironSource: 0 positive and 5 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Unity3D.
Read the full HaptX review and pricing or the ironSource review and pricing. You can also browse other HaptX alternatives we track.