Habana Labs vs Neural Magic
Habana Labs vs Neural Magic, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Habana Labs is on 66/100 and Neural Magic on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Habana Labs
- our overall score: 66/100 against 62/100
- headcount: 212 against 16
- headcount growth: +76.7% against -25.3%
- funding raised: $105M against $50.0M
Neural Magic
- domain rating: 91/100 against 66/100
- LinkedIn following: 19,124 against 11,760
At a glance
| Measure | Habana Labs | Neural Magic |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops AI and Deep Learning processors for data centers and cloud environments. | Software for efficient and performant machine learning execution in production. |
| Category | Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Data Center, Training | Computing, Acceleration, Artificial Intelligence, Inference |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2016 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Boston, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Habana Labs | Neural Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 212 | 16 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +76.7% | -25.3% |
| Total funding | $105M | $50.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 11,760 | 19,124 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Habana Labs | Neural Magic |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 66/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 51/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 40/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 70/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 66/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Habana Labs | Neural Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | AWS |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Habana Labs vs Neural Magic: common questions
Which is better, Habana Labs or Neural Magic?
On our 0-100 score Habana Labs rates higher (66/100 against 62/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Habana Labs and Neural Magic compare on the numbers?
Habana Labs leads on our overall score (66/100 against 62/100), headcount (212 against 16), headcount growth (+76.7% against -25.3%), funding raised ($105M against $50.0M). Neural Magic leads on domain rating (91/100 against 66/100), LinkedIn following (19,124 against 11,760).
Read the full Habana Labs review and pricing or the Neural Magic review and pricing. You can also browse other Habana Labs alternatives we track.